What if a submarine went down?


Are you a fan of the new ABC television series Last Resort? I must confess that I am. The show debuted on Thursday, September 27, 2012. In the first episode we are introduced to the crew of a U.S. Navy submarine and a team of SEALS who both become the victims of a false-flag attack which is blamed on Pakistan. The same day a YouTube video was going viral in which a top-level policy adviser, only six days earlier, brazenly suggested that the United States take down a submarine in order to start a war with Iran. Rather ironic don’t you think?
Here is a Wikipedia synopses of the show:
Marcus Chaplin is the Captain of the USS Colorado, the most powerful nuclear submarine ever built. When ordered to fire four nuclear missiles at Pakistan he defies protocol and demands confirmation. The submarine is consequently fired upon by the USS Illinois, after which the Colorado bottoms out and is left for dead. As in a false flag pretext for war, the US blames Pakistan for the attack, leading to a nuclear strike against Pakistan. The presumed-dead crew of the Colorado take control of the island of Sainte Marina where there is a NATO radar installation. Chaplin threatens to launch his missiles at any country, including the US, that attacks his ship.

From the beginning, the title “Last Resort” takes on a double meaning. Not only is this a reference to war, but also the means by which nations wars goes to war. Here we have an example of a fictional oath keeper, Capt. Marcus Chaplin, who will not blindly follow an illegal order. His courageous choice to stand down is followed by a series of events which force this would-be oath keeper to take up arms against his own countrymen and his “Last Resort” is to use the nuclear option against his own nation. You can watch the first episode on Hulu, http://www.hulu.com/watch/401576

While Hollywood is entertaining us with fantasy false-flag events and impossible moral dilemmas, in the real world we see government policy adviser talking candidly about how difficult it is to provoke a war when you want one. Patrick Clawson, deputy director of research for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) was caught on film suggesting that crisis initiation (i.e. false flags) are needed to “get America into war with Iran.”Having very little confidence that Obama “can get us into war” Patrick uses his super-power of evil logic to suggest that others take the appropriate action. “A submarine could go down. Who knows why?” Obviously, the final outcome makes right every action needed to achieve it.

It is shocking to hear this think-tank mouth piece share his conspiratorial view of history. What is shocking is NOT that Clawson admits virtually every major war into which America has entered is also one that we provoked or otherwise manufactured, no, what is shocking is how Patrick views this as both good and necessary. According to him, the USA is a big wuss when it comes to its policy against Iran. Besides sanctions, we need to get down and dirty says Patrick. Why couldn’t an Iranian submarine simply disappear? And if it did, we’d expect Iran to want to take a few good shots at us in retaliation, right? Yes, that would serve as a terrific pretext for beating the crap out of the nasty mullahs and turning their country into a glass parking lot.

One of America’s top constitutional and military law experts – Jonathan Turley – writes:

The fact that one of the leading analysis for the WINEP would feel comfortable in making such comments is itself quite chilling. It indicates that such discussions have become sufficiently regular that it has creeped into public discussion. Moreover, in his remarkably candid remarks, Clawson shows how the U.S. can easily be forced into direct combat by pushing Iran to simply kill some Americans or sink a few of our ships. Then members would be clamoring for revenge. While Clawson adds a passing caveat that he is not advocating such an approach, his remarks are clearly designed to show how the group can get the United States into a war for Israel if only we can get Iran to kill some of our citizens or soldiers. Those people are of course expendable props in Clawson’s realpolitik.

Who is this Clawson clown? Patrick Clawson worked as an economist for the International Monetary Fund between 1981 – 1985 and senior economist for the World Bank between 1985 – 1989. He is what John Perkins would call an economic hit-man. He is one of those talking head analysts quoted by every “serious” publication that covers the Iran nuclear issue and the typical pro-Israel neo-con who is goes out banging the war drums while at the same time tries to appear dispassionate and middle of the road. What a nice man.


This video footage not only features Clawson calling on the U.S. to manufacture a causus belli in order to start a war against Iran. It also reveals at least one insiders view of the world and he takes conspiracy theorizing to a whole new level. According to Clawson, the USA typically goes to war upon a manufactured (or induced) pretext [i.e., USA either sinks its own ship or induces the enemy to do so], Remember the Maine? These comments by Clawson raise the question of 9/11 and who was behind that attack. When you who consider who Clawson works for the answer become rather obvious.

.
Are these the sorts of ideas being offering to Barack Obama when he is behind close doors?  According to newly released documents by the John F. Kennedy Memorial Library, former Californian democratic senator George Smathers proposed an Operation Northwoods style false flag attack on Gitmo to then Massachusetts senator Kennedy before he was elected President. These are the pearls of wisdom offered by the D.C. pro-Israel policy elite.  These are the sorts of ideas Dennis Ross might’ve been offering to Barack Obama when he still worked for him? Yes, it seem obvious there are many other pro-war advisers in and out of the White House that are whispering lunacies like these into the President’s ear.
In March of this year, Patrick Clawson appeared on al-Jazeera television wherein he explains that “the MEK allegations that it was involved in the assassination of nuclear scientists inside Iran – If we are going to say that everyone involved in targeted assassinations is responsible as a terrorist, than Mr. Obama would be quickly thrown in jail because the United States has killed over a thousand people with its targeted assassinations through drones. Targeted assassinations have even included American citizens. If we use targeted assassinations as an instrument of war the United States is well accepted.” Clawson points out that we may not like that Israel uses targeted assassinations as a “valid instrument of war, but it is a valid instrument of war.”
 –
In a recent interview Pete Santilli questioned Clawson about his comments regarding crisis initiation and the suggestion that sinking an Iranian submarine could be an example of a false flag that would facilitate the US entering war with Iran. Clawson denied that he had ever made those comments even after Santilli played the audio of the video over the phone during the interview.  At this point, sounding as if he were having a mental breakdown from realizing he had been caught in a lie, Clawson came unglued and threatening Santilli with a lawsuit, arrest and personal harm if Santilli replayed the interview on his show.

This is not the first time Clawson has publicly called for “covert operations” as a “traditional means of bringing America to war.”   In January of 2012, Clawson said that covert campaigns were preferable to covert air-strikes by Israel or the US with regard to striking Iranian nuclear sites. “Sabotage and assassination is the way to go, if you can do it. It doesn’t provoke a nationalist reaction in Iran, which could strengthen the regime. And it allows Iran to climb down if it decides the cost of pursuing a nuclear weapon is too high.”
The plan for the coercive uprising in Iran by way of sanctions has not panned out and Netanyahu is becoming increasingly impatient. As we standing on the precipice of WW III, globalist like Patrick Clawson speak openly about their communist ideals of turning all the sovereign nations into exporters of “democracy” and their fascist methods such as false-flag events against nations who resist this New World Order. People like this are the domestic enemies every service man took and oath to defend our Constitution against, and they seek to transform not only America but our entire planet into that dystopic nightmare Orwell warned us about in his book 1984.-
Last Resortpromises to be very action packed and thought provoking. Hopefully it will open up TV views to the reality of the world we live in and spark a discussion four what it means to be an Oath Keeper and make people aware of false-flag attack are and how the elite of the world use them to start wars.The name for the show is a reference to the Latin phrase, “The Last Resort of Kings and Common Men” referring to the act of declaring war.  Historically, when a King had a trade dispute his first recourse was diplomacy and his last resort was to declare war. Louis XIV, King of France, had Ultima Ratio Regum (“The last resort of kings”) engraved on the cannons of his armies.
.
What was once true of Kings is now true of democratic States today, they both reserve war as their ultima ratio. What has changes is the need to justify war to the people. In the old days a King could invite his cousin to fight a war so they could get rid of the surplus population. These days the reasons for war may not have changed that much, but what has changed is the need for the powers that be to manufacturer consent. 
The term cause belli came into wide usage in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries with the rise of the political doctrine of jus ad bellum or “just war theory”.  A government would formally lay out its reasons for going to war, as well as its intentions in prosecuting it and the steps that might be taken to avert it. In so doing, the government would attempt to demonstrate that it was going to war only as a last resort (ultima ratio) and that it in fact possessed “just cause” for doing so.

– Ron Paul explains the just war theory of Christianity.

Unlike King’s before them, the modern democratic State of today needs a justification for war that they can sell to the people even if they have to manufacture an event. A good example is Hitler who longed to return to the days when sole sovereignty could be vested in one person, namely himself, and in order to get there he devised a false flag event which was sure to swing public opinion to his favor. Evidence discovered after World War II indicates that the fire that engulfed the Reichstag twenty-eight days after Hitler’s ascendancy to Chancellor was planned and executed by his henchmen, Herman Goering and Joseph Goebbels. Hitler publicly blamed the Communists, an accusation that allowed him to arrest the Communist members of the German parliament and thereby eliminate his major political opposition. Do you see any similarities to recent history?

Ron Paul: “What I Fear The Most Is a False Flag – Something Happening Where One of Our Ships Goes Down, Or … a Plane Goes Down, And of Course It HAD To Be The Iranians, You Know, For Sure, For Certain” Paul joins numerous other high-level government officials who have warned that a false flag may be launched against Iran to start a war:

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “What if a submarine went down?

  1. Well, he is at it again… with a recent interview done by radio host Bob Tuskin we hear Clawson asked about the Mossad agents who were arrested near the George Washington bridge just after the September 11th attacks [heard at 6:48 in the recording]… Amazingly, it seems as if Clawson says that it is “plausible” that these Mossad agents were somehow in the loop with the attacks or planning another one. He may deny saying this, as he also denied his earlier comments, but it would seem this man can’t help himself… he really is a pundit for the devil.

  2. Pingback: More Shocking Remarks from Zionist Lobbyist Revealed in Exclusive Interview « unSpy

  3. Pingback: Road to WW3 | China Moves Against The Dollar | unSpy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s